UT Wordmark Primary UT Wordmark Formal Shield Texas UT News Camera Chevron Close Search Copy Link Download File Hamburger Menu Time Stamp Open in browser Load More Pull quote Cloudy and windy Cloudy Partly Cloudy Rain and snow Rain Showers Snow Sunny Thunderstorms Wind and Rain Windy Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Twitter email alert map calendar bullhorn

Information and resources related to COVID-19


UT News

States Should Execute Their State Power and Raise the Wage

Building a better future for American children lies in creating effective policies today.

Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

Two color orange horizontal divider

Building a better future for American children lies in creating effective policies today. One of the more effective policy changes that must happen is raising the minimum wage to at least $10.10 and then indexing it to inflation so that American families can keep up with the rising prices of gas, food and housing.

While the minimum wage needs to be raised across the nation, the lack of effective movement at the federal level leaves it up to the states to step up and lead this movement. Texas should be one of the states leading the change.

The current minimum wage was established in 2009 at $7.25 per hour, only $7 more than at its inception in 1930 at 25 cents. While the current minimum wage has remained stagnant, the price of food, housing, gas and college tuition has not. As a result, purchasing power among low-wage families has decreased, and the gap between the poor and the middle class has widened. It has also increased dependence on government services such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid.

For the 20 states that have raised their minimum wages above the federal minimum, positive results are being seen. According to the Washington Labor Council, it is important to a state’s economy for low-wage earners to maintain their purchasing power beyond the ability to meet their basic needs.

In addition, several cities have also increased their minimum wages. For example, Seattle ($15), San Francisco ($10.74), Santa Fe, New Mexico ($10.66), New York City ($8), and San Jose, California ($10.15). To date, Santa Fe has seen no effect on employment and is doing economically better than Albuquerque, its sister city, which did not raise its minimum wage past the federal minimum.

When take-home pay is increased for low-income families, they tend to spend more within their local communities, which helps local businesses. This cycle creates better economic conditions locally and statewide. For business who employ minimum wage to low-wage workers, studies have shown higher productivity, decreased turnover, lower recruiting and training costs, decreased absenteeism, and increased worker morale for these businesses with increased minimum wages.

Those opposed to raising the minimum wage offer a number of arguments that suggest any increase would be detrimental to the economy. Unfortunately, when scrutinized these arguments fall apart.

First, several economists have indicated job loss as a consequence of raising the minimum wage. This argument is based in the theoretical premise that when price increases, demand will go down. This simple supply-demand construct essentially says that if the cost of paying low-wage workers increases, then the demand for low-wage workers will decrease. These authors state that the supply-demand premise only holds true when the critical condition of “all else equal” is met.

Considering the country’s ever changing economy and the changes increasing the minimum wage would inspire, the critical condition of all else equal is not maintained essentially invalidating the increase in unemployment argument.

Opponents often state that raising the minimum wage would actually harm the people it is intended to help. However, a report this year from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office states that for families living below the poverty threshold, a raise in minimum wage to $10.10 would increase real income, on net, by $5 billion and pull about 900,000 families above the poverty threshold.

Opponents also say that the only way to offset the wage increase is to lay off workers or relocate. Again, rigorous studies show businesses absorb the costs by other means such as slightly raising prices, initially accepting small profit reductions, or improving productivity.

With the highest number of hourly-wage workers of any state at about 3 million, Texas could set a strong precedent for the rest of the nation if state policymakers raise the minimum wage. Texas’ low-wage families would see an aggregate increase of $5.9 million to $8 million in additional income. This additional millions of dollars would go straight into the local and state economies.

Our state policymakers should take notice and raise the wage for the betterment of society and enable economic growth.

Shetal Vohra-Gupta is a research scientist for the Institute of Urban Policy Research and Analysis at The University of Texas at Austin.

A version of this op-ed appeared in the Fort Worth Star Telegram, Corpus Christi Caller Times, Dallas Morning News, Houston Chronicle, the San Antonio Express News, Beaumont Enterprise and the McAllen Monitor.

To view more op-eds from Texas Perspectives, click here.

Like us on Facebook.

Share this story on Twitter:


Media Contact

University Communications
Email: UTMedia@utexas.edu
Phone: (512) 471-3151

Texas Perspectives is a wire-style service produced by The University of Texas at Austin that is intended to provide media outlets with meaningful and thoughtful opinion columns (op-eds) on a variety of topics and current events. Authors are faculty members and staffers at UT Austin who work with University Communications to craft columns that adhere to journalistic best practices and Associated Press style guidelines. The University of Texas at Austin offers these opinion articles for publication at no charge. Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

The University of Texas at Austin