UT Wordmark Primary UT Wordmark Formal Shield Texas UT News Camera Chevron Close Search Copy Link Download File Hamburger Menu Time Stamp Open in browser Load More Pull quote Cloudy and windy Cloudy Partly Cloudy Rain and snow Rain Showers Snow Sunny Thunderstorms Wind and Rain Windy Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Twitter email alert map calendar bullhorn

UT News

Let’s Stop Treating Mental Illness Like It’s a Crime in Texas

Not only are some of our most vulnerable Texans better served if they can be diverted from jails, the state’s bottom line will benefit as well.

Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

Two color orange horizontal divider

Here are two unfortunate things we know: 1. Jails and prisons are where too many people with mental illness are receiving, or rather not receiving, treatment. 2. A jail cell is unlikely to be a place of healing.

Here’s one more thing we’re starting to realize: There’s a better way.

Not only are some of our most vulnerable Texans better served if they can be diverted from jails, the state’s bottom line will benefit as well. It’s less expensive, more efficient and more humane to treat mental illness like it’s not a crime.

In Texas, as in the rest of the nation, our communities don’t have the capacity to meet the demand for mental health services for all those in need, leaving jails and prisons to serve as de facto asylums. This leads to a vicious cycle in which people with mental illness are re-traumatized, released, and then re-incarcerated.

Consider Harris County. According to an article in The Texas Tribune, the county “has a list of about 900 people … who were in and out of jail at least five times in 2011 and 2012. Some had 30 or more visits, the sheriff said. From that list, 538 had been diagnosed with mental health issues that required treatment.”

Consider Travis County. According to a recent story from KXAN-TV: “In less than 10 years, jail statistics show the number of people being treated for mental health issues has gone from 250 per month to 650. As a result, the Travis County Jail has more beds set aside for mental health services than the state hospital.”

Consider Dallas County. The Dallas County Sheriff’s office notes on its website that the Lew Sterrett Justice Center houses the second largest mental health facility in Texas. It’s estimated that a full 25 percent of jail inmates participate in NorthSTAR, the county’s main provider of mental health services.

This is bad math from almost every direction.

Community-based professionals and institutions whose priority is mental health are better equipped to provide care than institutions that exist primarily to incarcerate. Imprisonment can compound the trauma that many people with mental illness have already suffered.

It’s more expensive to imprison someone than to treat that person. And it distracts from the core mission of law enforcement and correctional officers when they’re asked to act as social service providers of last resort. They are not trained or funded to properly provide the care needed.

Without question, some people with mental illness need to be incarcerated. But for low-level nonviolent offenders, we should look to measures that can divert people from jails and into community-based mental health treatment programs.

The sequential intercept model is a good example and highlights how this process of diversion can happen at every point along the criminal justice continuum — from the moment the 911 call is placed all the way to re-entry into the community after incarceration.

What’s required are common-sense reforms such as targeted training for police and 911 dispatchers, screening for behavioral health conditions at the early stages of the process, and improved coordination between the justice system and social service agencies in advance of re-entry.

For example, re-entry peer support, in which a recently released person is paired with a trained mentor who’s been through the same experience, has been tested in Pennsylvania with promising results. The legislature approved up to $1 million in funding last session for two pilot sites in Texas. Scaling of such a program, if the pilots prove successful, could make an enormous difference.

We should take these steps because it’s not only the right thing to do, but because the time is right. The evidence base for diversion programs has matured to the point where we can have confidence that the money will be well spent.

Law enforcement officials across the country are coming together in support of such measures. And advocates, experts and policymakers are recognizing that systemic change is needed to address systemic problems. It’s time for more Texas lawmakers to get on board.

Crisis can create opportunity. In the case of our mental health system, the current host of problems creates fertile conditions for the kind of creative problem solving and collaboration that can make “jail diversion” more than a trendy phrase.

We all know the way we’ve been doing things isn’t working. And we’re beginning to realize there’s a better way. What better time than now to do what we know is right and make our nation a healthier, more compassionate and more sensible place for all its people.

Octavio Martinez, Jr. is the executive director of the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health at The University of Texas at Austin. Lynda Frost is the director of planning and programs for the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health at The University of Texas at Austin.

A version of this op-ed appeared in the Huffington Post, Houston Chronicle, Fort Worth Star Telegram, Austin American Statesman and the San Angelo Standard Times.

To view more op-eds from Texas Perspectives, click here.

Like us on Facebook.

Media Contact

University Communications
Email: UTMedia@utexas.edu
Phone: (512) 471-3151

Texas Perspectives is a wire-style service produced by The University of Texas at Austin that is intended to provide media outlets with meaningful and thoughtful opinion columns (op-eds) on a variety of topics and current events. Authors are faculty members and staffers at UT Austin who work with University Communications to craft columns that adhere to journalistic best practices and Associated Press style guidelines. The University of Texas at Austin offers these opinion articles for publication at no charge. Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

The University of Texas at Austin