As Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos is tasked with figuring out how the Department of Education should address campus sexual assault, one of the most provocative issues under Title IX.
Last week, DeVos signaled that she would reconsider her Department’s guidelines for colleges and universities, set in 2011 by what’s called the Dear Colleague Letter and expanded upon in another 2014 memo.
The letter directed college administrators to adopt the preponderance of evidence standard — a lower burden of proof than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard employed by U.S. criminal courts.
The guidance, among other recommendations, also advised universities to take steps to protect the complainant from encountering the alleged perpetrator around campus during the hearing process and allow both the complainant and the perpetrator to appeal the outcome.
Essentially, college administrators were advised to balance the needs of all students who are victimized by sexual assault and the liberties of students accused. Many sexual assault survivors say the guidance was critical and necessary. But others criticized the guidance, arguing that the Obama Administration overstepped and took away due process rights from alleged perpetrators.
Now sexual assault survivors fear that DeVos might swing the pendulum back and remove protections to keep them and their friends and peers safe, while students who allege they were falsely accused feel like they finally have an advocate at the Department of Education.
That’s a lot at stake. I’ve worked for nearly 25 years studying sexual assault and domestic violence. I’ve seen what works and what doesn’t when it comes to adjudicating campus sexual assault. Here are three pieces of advice that I hope DeVos will keep in mind.
Consider a number of perspectives
Sexual assault allegations are highly charged for everyone involved. In order to be a leader who people can trust, DeVos must listen to a wide variety of reasoned voices on both sides, — and she must resist being swayed by — or fueling — zealots.
It was encouraging that she met with representatives from both SurvJustice, a non-profit organization focused on survivors’ rights, and Stop Abusive and Violent Environments, an organization that advocates for those who say they were falsely accused.
Unfortunately, DeVos’ meetings with these activists were predated by inflammatory comments from Candice Jackson, the head of the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, who claimed that about 90 percent of sexual assault claims on campuses were due to both parties being drunk. (Jackson didn’t cite any research to back up her remarks.
According to a 2010 study published in Violence Against Women, the prevalence of false sexual assault accusations is between 2 percent and 10 percent). While Jackson later apologized for her “flippant” remarks, DeVos and her colleagues need to be careful not to contribute to the divisiveness.
But DeVos also needs to cast a wider net. She should speak to campus-based Title IX lawyers, deans of students, researchers and others who handle these issues firsthand. Title IX lawyers and campus administrators deal with these issues intricately daily. They can divulge which campus policies work and which ones don’t. Researchers who study this issue can provide DeVos with crucial data points. This will help her base her decisions on facts rather than personal anecdotes.
Ask new questions
Over the last three decades, scientific advances greatly improved our ability to accurately measure the prevalence of sexual assault and understand its impact on victims. It is a pervasive problem. Over 23 percent of female and 5 percent of male undergraduates will experience rape or sexual assault at some point during their college career. Transgender and gender nonconforming students are even more vulnerable to sexual assault.
But it’s also a complicated, nuanced issued that’s notoriously difficult to adjudicate and riddled with myths. Alcohol, drugs and other crimes, including intimate partner violence and stalking, often come into play in these cases, and these layers need to be considered during a college or university’s disciplinary process. Survivors often face debilitating psychological, emotional and physical trauma that can often lead them to drop out of school. And most survivors choose not to report their sexual assaults, making it even more difficult for them to get the care they need to recover.
Given all this, DeVos must use the available statistics and newest research to end conversations that perpetuate myths and misunderstanding about sexual assault survivors and perpetrators. Instead, she should move the national conversation forward to tackle unanswered questions like, how do we reduce and eventually eliminate the perpetration by faculty, how does the university community understand personal and community responsibility, how does the university balance the liberties and needs of their students, can universities conceive of strategies where there is accountability and less litigation, how should the re-entry of students involved in these proceeding be handled,? Over the last three decades we have confirmed victimization rates and our understanding of the circumstances under which the victimization occur at our institutions are also well understood. DeVos’ also needs to ways to undo the resistance will accompany shifting the national conversation.
Address the issues we too often ignore
Finally, DeVos should be persistent in putting the marginalized Title IX issues on the public’s agenda. As sexual assault has come to dominate the national conversation, we’ve ignored other issues, like sexual harassment, stalking and dating/domestic abuse. And that’s a problem. One in five students will experience domestic violence, making it as prevalent as an issue on college campuses as sexual assault. Further, college students are more likely than any other demographic to be stalked — but they’re also less likely to report such incidents to the police.
These issues are serious concerns for college students that can potentially affect their ability to learn and reach their educational goals. There is a moral, ethical and legal responsibility to address these barriers. We need a strong leader to do it.
DeVos is at a turning point. She has the potential to continue an open, honest and useful dialog and to strive toward exemplary responses to this crime on college campuses. But she could also chip away at the progress we’ve made on addressing campus sexual assault in recent years. She has a duty to implement a thoughtful, balanced system that protects both student victims and the liberties of students who are accused. My hope is that she is up for the job.
Noël Busch-Armendariz is the University Presidential Professor and director of the Institute on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault in the School of Social Work at The University of Texas at Austin.
A version of this op-ed appeared in TIME.
To view more op-eds from Texas Perspectives, click here.
Like us on Facebook.