UT Wordmark Primary UT Wordmark Formal Shield Texas UT News Camera Chevron Close Search Copy Link Download File Hamburger Menu Time Stamp Open in browser Load More Pull quote Cloudy and windy Cloudy Partly Cloudy Rain and snow Rain Showers Snow Sunny Thunderstorms Wind and Rain Windy Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Twitter email alert map calendar bullhorn

UT News

Newspapers’ Limited Antitrust Exemption Would Bring a New Way of Thinking That is Long Overdue

 It’s good that newspapers are trying to redefine their relationships with Facebook and Google.

Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

Two color orange horizontal divider

During the past 20 years, many U.S. newspapers have experimented with online news delivery, but they’ve had just limited success. It’s true that consumers are increasingly getting news online, but most turn to news aggregators such as Yahoo News and Google News or social media like Facebook.

The problem is most aggregators and social media sites do not produce original news content. Rather, they republish news stories produced by newspaper reporters and ultimately benefit from such content without having to pay much, if at all, for it. Some newspaper publishers even get really upset — calling Google a “digital vampire” sucking “newspaper blood.”

With a huge user base that attracts a large amount of ad spending, Google and Facebook have evolved into tech giants with unprecedented global market power. In contrast, most of the 1,300 U.S. daily newspapers operate in narrowly defined geographic areas with average weekday circulation under 30,000 — and dropping. For these newspapers to compete with Google and Facebook online is like a local diner trying to complete with McDonald’s. There is simply no chance of winning.

It is against this backdrop that the News Media Alliance is requesting a limited antitrust exemption from Congress so that newspapers can negotiate with Google and Facebook collectively. It is unclear what kind of “negotiation” they plan to conduct, but this indicates a new way of thinking that is long overdue.

Part of the problem is self-inflicted. Most newspapers have been actively sharing their content on these big platforms — for example, many have hired social media editors to distribute content on Facebook and Twitter for free. As a result, many online readers have stopped visiting newspaper websites, and social media sites have become a major source for news — 44 percent of U.S. adults now get news on Facebook.

This has affected newspapers’ advertising revenue. After 20 years of experimenting with digital, newspapers’ online advertising revenue has remained underwhelming, increasingly only slightly from $3.2 billion in 2007 to $3.5 billion in 2014. In contrast, Google and Facebook have enjoyed tremendous successes in the online world. Google reported $89.6 billion in global revenue and Facebook reported $27.6 billion in 2016. As a reference, total U.S. digital ad spending was  $72.5 billion in 2016.

So, all evidence suggests that U.S. newspapers have lost this digital battle — in terms of audience attention and advertising revenue. The reason they are still here is that their print editions, despite substantial declines, still generate advertising and subscription revenue that pays the bills.

The good news is major metro newspapers still reach one-third of the local adults in their markets, and surprisingly, the vast majority of them are print, paying readers. This is good news because newspapers remain the most important institutions providing much-needed local coverage that no Facebook, no Google, no Twitter or Instagram would even consider producing. Tens of thousands of journalists are still doing their jobs covering our communities the best they can, often under stress, sometimes humiliation, when management makes decisions to address problems they didn’t create.

Now newspapers are trying to redefine their relationships with Facebook and Google through an antitrust exemption. On the one hand, this exemption, even if granted, would not easily change the result of a losing game — one that’s between a local diner and McDonald’s — especially if the newspaper industry does not first address some of the unwise, short-sighted decisions made by itself in the name of “digital transformation.”

On the other, it is extremely important that policymakers recognize how market power has shifted toward digital giants that are indeed swallowing journalism (and everything else).

In a market that truly encourages competition, consumers have the final say. Just as health-conscious consumers managed to propel McDonald’s to offer healthier choices, there is a lot news consumers can do, if, and only if, they care.

Iris Chyi is an associate professor of journalism in the Moody College of Communication at The University of Texas at Austin. 

A version of this op-ed appeared in USA Today, Corpus Christi Caller Times, The Rivard Report, Waco Tribune Herald, and the San Antonio Express News.

To view more op-eds from Texas Perspectives, click here.

Like us on Facebook.


Media Contact

University Communications
Email: UTMedia@utexas.edu
Phone: (512) 471-3151

Texas Perspectives is a wire-style service produced by The University of Texas at Austin that is intended to provide media outlets with meaningful and thoughtful opinion columns (op-eds) on a variety of topics and current events. Authors are faculty members and staffers at UT Austin who work with University Communications to craft columns that adhere to journalistic best practices and Associated Press style guidelines. The University of Texas at Austin offers these opinion articles for publication at no charge. Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

The University of Texas at Austin