UT Wordmark Primary UT Wordmark Formal Shield Texas UT News Camera Chevron Close Search Copy Link Download File Hamburger Menu Time Stamp Open in browser Load More Pull quote Cloudy and windy Cloudy Partly Cloudy Rain and snow Rain Showers Snow Sunny Thunderstorms Wind and Rain Windy Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Twitter email alert map calendar bullhorn

UT News

Descendants-of-Slavery Movement Undermines the Spirit of Black History Month

Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

Two color orange horizontal divider
Black History Month

There is an increasingly bitter debate growing in the black community that is undermining the spirit of Black History Month about whether African American/black identity should be defined by descendants of slavery or by African ancestry.

At the center of the debate is the social movement referred to as ADOS, or the American Descendants of Slavery. Co-founded in 2016, ADOS is a political and social movement whose purpose is to advocate for reparations, the idea of compensating those who have been wronged, on behalf of black Americans. The group argues that reparations for slavery is economically and morally justified.

The idea of reparations, albeit controversial, is not new and dates back to 1672. However, it is not the advocacy for reparations that has thrust ADOS into the national spotlight. Instead, it is the emphasis on distinguishing black American descendants of slavery from black immigrants, a focus that essentially pits black Americans against black immigrants.

It is understandable why proponents of ADOS seek to distinguish black Americans from black immigrants. There are real and consequential differences in our lived experiences. For example, black immigrants are better educated and have higher median incomes than black Americans.

Although this fight for economic and social justice for black Americans is commendable, a closer examination of its rhetoric and agenda suggests an anti-African, anti-black-immigrant stance that is historically shortsighted. Critics characterize ADOS as having harmful anti-black policies and contend that its leaders do not believe that black Americans can or should have any connection with Africa.

As a professor of African and African diaspora studies and a racial identity scholar, I teach a class called the Politics of Black Identity that examines the diverse and divided black community and highlights the tensions that sometimes exist among African Americans, Africans, and Afro-Caribbean people. While it is important to acknowledge the differences between these groups, my goal is to critically analyze the behaviors, attitudes and philosophies of black leaders and movements that ultimately undermine or advance progress for all black people.

In a thoughtful yet provocative piece, ADOS co-founder Antonio Moore argues that recent immigrants from Africa seek a “solidarity of sameness,” yet do not have the history or lived experience to be considered in any claims for reparations.

But more problematic is the dismissal of any desire to seek solidarity among all people of African descent. Moore argues that prior to the term African American being introduced by Jesse Jackson in 1989, black Americans were black, negro and colored, but never identified on a national level as African. However, this is historically inaccurate.

Enslaved Africans were always clear about who they were, and they never forgot where they came from, in spite of attempts of slavery to erase their memory of Africa. The scholar Asa Hilliard reminds us that evidence of this can be seen by how Africans put “African” in the names of their independent organizations, such as the Free African Society, the African Methodist Episcopal Church, and the first African masonic lodge, initially called the African Lodge.

Activist Paul Robeson once said, “In my music, my plays, my film, I want to carry always this central idea: to be African.” In his autobiography, Olaudah Equiano recounted his experiences of slavery in the West Indies, Virginia and Georgia as a black immigrant. While his ethnic group was Igbo, he maintained an African identity as evidenced by signing his book “Olaudah, an enslaved African.”

The historian Sterling Stuckey explains that the different African ethnic groups experienced a common horror on slave ships and sought to form slave unity across cultural lines. This is why identifying as African became so important.

Whatever the differences, the fact still remains that racism does not discriminate based on being ADOS or a black immigrant. As recently noted by Jessica Aiwuyor, “When Amadou Diallo was shot down by the NYPD, no one asked him if he was the descendant of U.S. slaves first.”

As we celebrate Black History Month, we should not fall prey to forces that seek to divide us. Remember that Black Lives Matter embraced the differences and diversity that have always characterized the black experience, while intervening in violence inflicted on all black communities.

Kevin Cokley is the Oscar and Anne Mauzy Regents Professor of Educational Research and Development and director of the Institute for Urban Policy Research and Analysis at The University of Texas at Austin.

A version of this op-ed appeared in USA Today.

Media Contact

University Communications
Email: UTMedia@utexas.edu
Phone: (512) 471-3151

Texas Perspectives is a wire-style service produced by The University of Texas at Austin that is intended to provide media outlets with meaningful and thoughtful opinion columns (op-eds) on a variety of topics and current events. Authors are faculty members and staffers at UT Austin who work with University Communications to craft columns that adhere to journalistic best practices and Associated Press style guidelines. The University of Texas at Austin offers these opinion articles for publication at no charge. Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

The University of Texas at Austin