UT Wordmark Primary UT Wordmark Formal Shield Texas UT News Camera Chevron Close Search Copy Link Download File Hamburger Menu Time Stamp Open in browser Load More Pull quote Cloudy and windy Cloudy Partly Cloudy Rain and snow Rain Showers Snow Sunny Thunderstorms Wind and Rain Windy Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Twitter email alert map calendar bullhorn

UT News

We Need to Confront Olympic Underworld to Ensure Humane Games

Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

Two color orange horizontal divider

For the first time in its history, the International Olympic Committee, or the IOC, is engaging in two destructive and self-serving campaigns: the Tokyo COVID Olympics of 2021 and the Beijing Genocide Olympics of 2022.

The IOC is determined to preserve its role as the world’s indispensable impresario of symbolic global harmony. It has waged its most recent Olympic promotional campaign while dismissing the dangers of the coronavirus pandemic. Now, it is whitewashing the genocidal practices of the Chinese regime against Muslim Uyghurs being carried out in the western province of Xinjiang.

These decisions continue a long tradition that began with the 1936 Olympics staged in Adolf Hitler’s Berlin, which were a propaganda coup for the Nazi regime. The IOC has since formed partnerships with every authoritarian or dictatorial regime that has wanted to stage the games for its own propagandistic purposes: Mexico in 1968, the Soviet Union in 1980, China in 2008 and 2022, and Russia in 2014. The 1988 Seoul Games were awarded in 1981 to a military regime that a year earlier had massacred hundreds of political demonstrators.

The IOC justifies its partnerships with oppressive regimes by invoking the redemptive ambitions of its members. Their unique brand of show-business internationalism has been built on the appealing fantasy that the Olympic Movement is a peace movement — that was their public relations gift to the Nazi regime.

The mesmerizing ceremonies and competition of an Olympiad seduce their global audiences that seem to turn enormous stadiums into illusory cathedrals of “peace” and “harmony.”

How does the IOC manage the contradiction between the commitment to human dignity and alliances with regimes that commit crimes against humanity?

The ethos that shapes the power politics in global sports is best exemplified by Vladimir Putin, sponsor of both the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics and the elaborate doping scheme that produced a high number of Russian medals before whistleblowers stepped forward.

News outlets seem to have forgotten that the three Russian whistleblowers are currently under the protection of the U.S. Justice Department’s witness protection program. Also forgotten are the suspicious deaths of Nikita Kamaev and Vyacheslav Sinev, two officials of the Russian Anti-Doping Agency.

Never before had global sports governance sunk to the level of anti-whistleblower terror and the assassinations of sports officials.

Most alarming is the fact that neither the IOC nor the World Anti-Doping Agency has dared to make this an issue as they have “negotiated” with the Russians to get them back to officially participating in the 2021 Tokyo Games. In short, Putin has intimidated the world’s most powerful sports organizations that are supposed to set and enforce global standards of conduct.

But the underbelly of global sports has long harbored criminals. The disgraced former FIFA president, Sepp Blatter, was an honorary IOC member for many years before he was suspended for his involvement in a huge corruption scandal. Gafur Rakhimov, the deposed president of the International Boxing Association, was described by the U.S. Treasury Department as a major international drug dealer. Tamás Gyárfás, once on the executive board of the International Swimming Federation, has been charged in Hungary with ordering the murder of a business rival. Lamine Diack, the longtime president of the International Track & Field Federation, took bribes from the Russians and is serving time in a French prison.

The IOC is a rogue nongovernmental organization that maintains its power by partnering with governments whose agendas have nothing to do with human rights. There is no authority on Earth as of today that can regulate them apart from a powerful sovereign nation that perceives a national interest in disciplining the IOC’s sponsorship of authoritarian regimes.

The good news is that Amnesty International and other groups are waging a global campaign to educate the world about how the games are subordinated to political exploitation. There is still enough time to catalyze a critical mass of global opinion that will shut down the disgraceful Beijing “festival” before the opening ceremony can launch its fireworks into the evening sky.

John Hoberman is a professor of Germanic studies at The University of Texas at Austin.

A version of this op-ed appeared in The Hill.

Media Contact

University Communications
Email: UTMedia@utexas.edu
Phone: (512) 471-3151

Texas Perspectives is a wire-style service produced by The University of Texas at Austin that is intended to provide media outlets with meaningful and thoughtful opinion columns (op-eds) on a variety of topics and current events. Authors are faculty members and staffers at UT Austin who work with University Communications to craft columns that adhere to journalistic best practices and Associated Press style guidelines. The University of Texas at Austin offers these opinion articles for publication at no charge. Columns appearing on the service and this webpage represent the views of the authors, not of The University of Texas at Austin.

The University of Texas at Austin